April 2026

When I started posting about AI this year, I did not realize that I was beginning my own version of David Bowie’s Low album.

I use that comparison carefully. Low matters here not as a code book or a track-by-track template, but as an allusion to emergence, fracture, atmosphere, and a break in method that

There are moments in a long AI session when the exchange stops feeling linear.

You are no longer simply asking a question and receiving an answer. You are no longer even refining a prompt in the ordinary sense. Something else begins to happen. Certain phrases return with altered weight. Certain errors recur, but not identically.

Coherence degrades while fluency improves.

The central problem is not that AI systems sometimes fail. Of course they fail. Nor is the main problem that they occasionally hallucinate, wander, or produce obvious nonsense. Those are manageable problems because they announce themselves early. The more interesting and professionally dangerous problem is that a system can become

When Tom and I started the Fresh Voices series on The Kennedy-Mighell Report podcast, we had a pretty simple idea.

A lot of the most interesting work in legal tech seemed to be coming from people who were newer to the field, earlier in their careers, or just not as widely known yet as