Most people use AI the way the system is designed to be used: ask a question, get a synthesis, and leave with answer. Keep it brief, transactional, and clean. We treat hallucination as a bug to be patched and drift as a signal to reboot.
This is exactly backward.
As popularized in AI discourse by
Most legal AI talk is still focused on whether the engine starts, while the real danger is that no one knows who’s actually steering the car once it hits the highway. It turns out the human in the loop isn’t a safety feature if the human doesn’t know which loop they’re currently standing in.
We
The March issue of my Personal Strategy Compass newsletter is out.
This month’s piece explores something I’ve been noticing about strategic planning. The hardest part is usually not the work of planning itself. It’s the residue that planning drags along with it.
Ideas, priorities, and intentions tend to accumulate. We carry them forward month after
Let me explain why that is a principle, not a preference, and
The promise is leverage: brief, high-intent sessions. You bring the question, the tool brings the synthesis, and you leave with more than you arrived with. That is the value proposition.
Here is what often happens
We pay AI tools to do the hard work, like the synthesis, the heavy lifting, and the cognitive labor we do not have time for. What we often get instead is a tool that produces a decent first draft and then hands the real work back to us.
Not just the hard work. The administrative
