I have just posted a trio of new research white papers to SSRN. These represent the latest output from the Kennedy Idea Propulsion Laboratory and the culmination of my work over the last month to move AI beyond “utilitarian drift.” This is the cycle of incremental efficiency gains that ultimately generates no transformative insight.

An investigation into why serious AI work depends less on clever prompts and more on defending invariants, boundaries, and human judgment.

At the end of a long, technical AI session this week, something became clear to me: human-in-the-loop is being misunderstood in ways that matter.

The issue wasn’t whether the system could generate outputs quickly

    To propose a Preliminary Inquest, please complete the form below.

    I review all submissions personally and provide an initial Wicked vs. Tame assessment at no charge within 5–7 business days.

    Contact Information







    The Problem





    Organizational Readiness

    If this investigation reveals you're solving the wrong problem, does your organization have the authority and willingness to change course? (required)


    Timeline

    Desired timeline (required)


    How did you hear about KIPL?




    Kennedy Idea Propulsion Laboratory logo

    In 1980, I wrote a senior thesis paper called “Imagination: A Romantic Ideal.” My investigation then was a critique of the German and English Romantics who, in their zeal to undo the “damage” of Enlightenment Reason, merely erected a new idol: The Imagination.

    Through a concrete analysis of Keats and Poe, I discovered a truth

    The Kennedy Idea Propulsion Laboratory investigates human-AI interaction challenges when standard playbooks fail. Research focuses on developing frameworks for complex problem diagnosis, investigative methodology, and collaborative intelligence systems.


    FEATURED INVESTIGATION

    Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) Interaction Design

    Investigating how humans and AI systems can work together to amplify insight rather than automate judgment. The research challenges the prevailing

    Retiring the Scoreboard: Why I’m Done Counting Books

    For many years, I ran a 52 Books in 52 Weeks challenge on my blog, usually as my first blog post of the year, which I updated each month. It was an annual public commitment, a visible signal of intellectual seriousness, and a helpful forcing function. I

    I launched Personal Strategy Compass as a premium newsletter a year ago. The decision made sense on paper: quality content, established expertise, proven frameworks. But something never quite felt settled.

    Not wrong, exactly. Just… misaligned.

    Then I drew an Oblique Strategies card during my own quarterly planning: “Honor thy error as a hidden intention.”

    If

    Why Your 2026 Career Security Depends on Your December Energy Audit

    As the legal market approaches the end of 2025, a pervasive, quiet anxiety has taken hold. Between the “spreadsheet economics” of law firm layoffs and the looming shadow of 2026, many senior professionals are responding with a predictable, yet dangerous, reflex.

    They are working


    test


    For ambitious professionals, saying “no” is a celebrated strategic act. We use the “Strategic No” to reclaim our time, prune our commitments, and simplify our lives. It’s a powerful feeling of control and liberation.

    But what about the day after?

    What happens when the relief of a clear calendar fades and you’re left with a